Timetable, we don’t need to stinkin’ timetable
August 23rd, 2008 by Sonny
Oh wait, apparently we do:
Dan Froomkin - A Timetable By Any Other Name - washingtonpost.com
In agreeing to pull U.S. combat troops out of Iraqi cities by June, and from the rest of the country by 2011, President Bush has apparently consented to precisely the kind of timetable that, when Democrats called for one, he dismissed as “setting a date for failure.” Bush can call it an “aspirational goal” until he turns blue, but a timetable is exactly what it is, thank you very much.Bush has repeatedly warned that politics and public opinion should have no role in the decision about when to leave Iraq, but apparently he just meant American politics and public opinion. A clear majority of Americans has favored a withdrawal timetable for several years now, putting anti-war Democrats in control of Congress in 2006.
Bush ignored them. But in the end, he bowed to the will of the Iraqis elected representatives. After five and a half years of occupation, it was their turn to put a gun to Bushs head: The timetable was the price they demanded for agreeing to let American troops remain in the country beyond the expiration of a United Nations mandate in December.
Don’t you hate it when an occupied country gets all uppity?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
